Monday, March 21, 2016

A Dress of Many Colors



This is another new dress for Mehetabel.  It is New Look 6301 which I've made quite a few times, but always sleeveless and with the straight skirt.  I blogged about two of these dresses, here and here. I also made this dress for the officiant at Mehetabel and Aloysius's wedding, as well as versions for the bridesmaids (but we wound up going with a more formal style).


This iteration has 3/4 length sleeves, the length Mehetabel prefers for a sleeved dress or top.  Like the previous versions, I added 10 inches to the belt pieces.  I also lengthened the skirt by 10 inches to make it more of a midi length.  And, I decided to try something that Andrea of Sew to Fit did on her version--I used the right front piece for both sides of the bodice instead of the pattern piece provided for the left front which just has a tuck in it.  I was curious to see how this would affect the bodice's fit.  Okay, really, I just liked the idea of cutting out one less piece. 


And while I like the look of using the same front bodice pieces, this bodice is a bit too loose and the neckline is too low for Mehetabel to wear to work without a camisole underneath.  But other than that, the dress fits well, it's comfortable, she loves the colorful fabric and the length of the skirt (swishy!), and it works perfectly with her boots.


Before starting this blog, I had made several McCall's 5974s for Mehetabel and she loves them. However, the length of the skirt didn't work well with her boots, so she wears the dresses in warmer weather with other shoes.  The proportions just weren't right with her boots.  So with this pattern, I thought it would be fun to see if we could come up with a faux-wrap style with a length she'd like with her boots.  This does the trick!  


I have a couple fabrics in my stash that I think Mehetabel would love in this style, but they're precious and no longer available for purchase so I don't want to make any mistakes with them.  To make sure everything was copacetic with the sleeve length, the skirt shape and style, and the experiment with the bodice front pieces, I whipped up this version in a fabric that I bought at a deep discount and is still available.


The polyester/spandex ITY knit is from Joann which I purchased last summer at a 60% discount. The fabric has almost all the colors of the rainbow, and I dithered about which color to use for the coverstitch, finally deciding on purple.  My Babylock coverstitch machine sailed through like a champ, but my computerized Janome sewing machine had fits with this fabric.  I can't begin to tell you how many needle changes I made, how many times I re-threaded the machine and the bobbin, how many times I fooled with the tension, etc.  Eventually, I gave up and switched to my 33-year-old mechanical Bernina which handled the fabric perfectly.   All seams were finished with the serger.
The neckline was finished on with the coverstitch, as were the sleeve and dress hems which were sewn at 5/8".  The shoulder seams were stabilized with twill tape.  The sleeves were sewn in flat, and the skirt pieces were sewn to the bodice pieces and then the side seams were sewn.  The fabric is fairly heavy, and after finishing the dress--but before Mehetabel tried it on--I was worried that the heaviness of the fabric combined with the extra 10 inches of skirt length was just too, too much for the dress to keep its shape.  

Coverstitched neckline
The instructions call for elastic at the waist--in a casing made from the seam allowances.  I'm not a big fan of this method.  I hadn't added the elastic to my earlier versions, but after I'd finished constructing this dress, I added clear elastic to the front and back waist sections (sewn onto the seam allowances).  This gives the skirt a little more support.   


Mr. Arbuthnot, the Bespokeability studio supervisor and design assistant, approved of this dress. He found the leftover fabric soft and silky--ideal for a nap, rendering him unavailable for today's photography session.  However, his assistant and good friend, Björn,  took his new duties quite seriously.

Björn lives with Mehetabel and Aloysius.  He is almost six-months-old and a sweetie-pie.


Saturday, March 19, 2016

To Make a Short Story Long: My Take on McCall's 6886

These days, I'm trying to squeeze in sewing whenever I can--that is, whenever my new studio supervisor, pictured in the sidebar (big smile, heart-shaped nose, large pink tongue), is snoozing. Mr. Arbuthnot is a delightful, mischievous, and cuddly young man who wants to be with me all the time; however, he is also very curious.  He thinks anything and everything was put on this earth for him to chew and swallow.  So, it shouldn't be any surprise that my studio supervisor isn't actually allowed in the studio!  Sewing now happens when he is safely tucked in bed.
Mr. Arbuthnot in his younger days.
Look at that cute little tummy!
Mr. Arbuthnot has been in my life for several months now.  I love him, but I have missed spending time in my studio.  I thought a few quick projects in the evening would satisfy my sewing cravings and help me figure out how to balance my peppy pup's needs with my own.


No, that's not Mr. Arbuthnot.  It's his assistant, Björn.
For my first project during Mr. Arbuthnot's sleepy time, I chose the ubiquitous McCall's 6886. There are loads of reviews online for this dress, many of which stress how easy and versatile it is. And I agree.  It is easy and versatile.  But in true bespokeability fashion, I took a simple pattern and made it much more complicated than it needed to be.  Heh.  Oh well.


I made this dress for my daughter, Mehetabel, to wear with her brown suede boots.  (It is still plenty cold to wear boots here; it's snowing as I write this.)  For this first version, I raided my stash. The fabric is a super soft and lightweight crepe jersey from www.fabricmartfabrics.com, and features small geometric shapes in dark chocolate, passion fruit, café au lait, and apricot.  I'm hungry.

So, how did I complicate matters?  Well, I decided the fabric was a bit too thin for Mehetabel to feel comfortable wearing it while teaching.  To fix that, I decided to line the dress, but in a different manner than I normally would.  Well, except I have kinda/sorta done it before.  For this dress, I wrote about Sandra Betzina's method for lining knit pants which I adapted for lining the skirt of that dress--and it worked very well.  I thought I could use the same method for lining this dress; I particularly like that it creates a clean, nicely finished hem.  I also decided to use the same method on the sleeves.  The sleeves didn't really need to be lined; it was my laziness--not wanting to hem the sleeves--that caused me to do it.


Close-up of the lining/hem
I used tricot, purchased at Mill End in Portland, Oregon, to line the dress.  Except "line" isn't entirely accurate.  While I did line the sleeves, body of the dress, and shoulders from the hem up, I treated the fabric/lining as one for the armscyes and neckline.  After the sleeves were attached to the lined/underlined dress, I serged the armscye seams.  The pattern calls for turning under the seam allowance at the neck and stitching it down.  I prefer to face necklines as I think it creates a more polished product.  So I traced the front and back necklines from the pattern pieces and drew facing patterns.  I almost wrote that I "drafted" facings, but that seems a bit grandiose for what I actually did!   I fused interfacing to the fabric prior to cutting out the facing pieces (more laziness!).  
I do love the clean neckline
Even though I made a series of mistakes while making this dress, I'm very pleased with the outcome.  I think Mehetabel looks great in it, and more importantly, she likes it!  The lining gives a nice finish to the dress, although I'll do things a little differently next time.  


Order of Operations and Blunders / Notes to Self:
  • After pre-treating the fabric and determining my preliminary changes to the size 14 pattern pieces for length, I cut out the fashion fabric and the tricot lining pieces.
  • The tricot is significantly heavier than the fashion fabric.  The tricot also has a two-way stretch whereas the fashion fabric has a four-way stretch.  I thought these things might possibly cause problems, but damn the torpedoes, I wanted to sew so it was full speed ahead!  Except for the miscalculation for the lining's length, the tricot worked well.
  • I am embarrassed to say that I had a terrible time figuring out how much shorter the lining should be from the fashion fabric.  I took 2.25 inches off the length of the lining.  This created a deeper hem, but with the heaviness of the tricot, the fashion fabric didn't have enough support at the hemline to make it as clean as I would've liked.  If I do this again, I'll take one inch off the length of the lining--and/or beef up the fashion fabric with some fusible interfacing at the hem.  
  • For the next steps, I pressed each seam well before moving on to sewing the successive seams.
  • I sewed the bottom of the lining dress front to the bottom of the fashion fabric dress front, right sides together.  Then I did the same for the dress back pieces.  The lining pieces were 2 1/4 inches shorter than the fashion fabric.
  • I pinned the fashion fabric front to the back and the lining front to the back (these pieces were already connected at the hem) and sewed the side seams, making a long tube.  I turned it right side out, matching the lining with the outer fabric at the armscyes and neckline.
  • I stabilized the fashion fabric shoulders with fusible interfacing and sewed front/back shoulder seams of the fashion fabric right sides together, and then repeated this with the lining shoulder seams.
  • I attached the hem of the sleeve pieces (lining and fashion fabric) right sides together. The lining was one inch shorter than the fashion fabric.  This is what I should have done for the dress pieces!  Nuts.
  • Like the dress, I sewed the sleeve side seams together (fashion-hem-lining), turned the tube right side out and basted the lining/fashion fabric at the top of the sleeve.
  • I prefer to sew sleeves in flat, but because of my lining experiment, the sleeves were set in.  The fashion fabric/lining of the sleeves were treated as one--ditto the dress's armscyes.  I managed to snag excess amounts of the lining fabric into my seams.  And I had quality time with my seam ripper. 
  • After unpicking white thread from white lining, I serged the armscye seams.
  • I made the facing pieces, finished the raw edges, sewed them together, and sewed them to the neckline (treating fashion fabric and lining as one) in a 5/8 inch seam.  After trimming and pressing, I hand stitched the facing edge to the lining/underlining so it would stay put.  It amuses me that I was too lazy to use my coverstitch machine to hem the sleeves, but had no problem hand sewing the neck facing in place.
So, that's it.  That's what I did.  Was it worth it?  Yes, I think so.  This dress looks polished and professional, and it is appropriate for Mehetabel to wear in her high school classroom.  I envision all sorts of possibilities for this pattern.